On the Ousia that is Feminine but not of a Woman.

And, from the lo and behold of a proposition which is not the result of a psaltery’s pseudepigraphic composition within and beyond the threshold of the Act demanding not of the wisdom of Solomon but of the reception of “The key to the world in the split of the prepubescent, the psychoanalyst no longer has to expect a look, but sees himself become a voice∙” and from that Voice, powders the first Ανάγκη and yet not in particles∙ and, that is not discourse- it is a breath and a letter, unparticular and not in particles, from which the discourse and the Voice mark the lamina of destiny and time upon the subject and its flesh to embody the word and the signifier∙ those are Homoousian to the Das Ding, the Letters, the Breath and that which causes desire but itself cannot desire unless privated and ex-posed at the same time to the gnosis of holiness and carnal acquaintances for that which is sup-positional to prevail in immaculation, not emasculation, and, from whose kernel shall a homo-ousia that is not a man, produce the digammon Stigma to become the episemon six within the signifier, for the letter becomes a number, and from the mark is fashioned sex: this is a riddle∙ for, the question to mark the tantalized nerves of a psychoanalyst’s transference to the Cause is, not what is a woman, or, what does she want, but, what is not a man: what does not have a phallus but is not a woman, and not an object with No-Body, a being which, in its silence, even among the spectrum of the perversion of perversions, one cannot copulate with and breed devils∙ to this, the various generations of analysts ought to give us a testimony.

 

 

The Psychoanalytic Act: On the Formation of the No-Body.

By Petros Patounas.

The School of the Freudian Letter Publications.